1992 Buick Roadmaster vs. 2000 Ford TS-50
To start off, 2000 Ford TS-50 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Buick Roadmaster. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Buick Roadmaster would be higher. At 5,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1992 Buick Roadmaster is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Buick Roadmaster (177 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2000 Ford TS-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Buick Roadmaster should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TS-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Buick Roadmaster weights approximately 632 kg more than 2000 Ford TS-50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Buick Roadmaster (394 Nm) has 219 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford TS-50. (175 Nm). This means 1992 Buick Roadmaster will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Buick Roadmaster | 2000 Ford TS-50 | |
Make | Buick | Ford |
Model | Roadmaster | TS-50 |
Year Released | 1992 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5733 cc | 1989 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 177 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 394 Nm | 175 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1840 kg | 1208 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 132 L |