1992 Cadillac Allante vs. 1964 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1992 Cadillac Allante is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 1992 Cadillac Allante is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Cadillac Allante (290 HP) has 201 more horse power than 1964 Triumph 2000. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Cadillac Allante should accelerate faster than 1964 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Cadillac Allante weights approximately 538 kg more than 1964 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Cadillac Allante | 1964 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Triumph |
| Model | Allante | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4565 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 290 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 74.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 76 mm |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1708 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2700 mm |
