1992 Cadillac Allante vs. 2004 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Cadillac Allante. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Cadillac Allante would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (296 HP) has 6 more horse power than 1992 Cadillac Allante. (290 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1992 Cadillac Allante. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Cadillac Allante weights approximately 46 kg more than 2004 Ford Mustang.
Because 2004 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Cadillac Allante, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Cadillac Allante | 2004 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | Allante | Mustang |
Year Released | 1992 | 2004 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4565 cc | 4606 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 290 HP | 296 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 90.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 90 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1708 kg | 1662 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2620 mm |