1992 Cadillac Allante vs. 2012 Ford E-350
To start off, 2012 Ford E-350 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Cadillac Allante. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Cadillac Allante would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Cadillac Allante (290 HP) has 35 more horse power than 2012 Ford E-350. (255 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Cadillac Allante should accelerate faster than 2012 Ford E-350. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford E-350 weights approximately 1122 kg more than 1992 Cadillac Allante.
Because 2012 Ford E-350 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Ford E-350. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Cadillac Allante, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Cadillac Allante | 2012 Ford E-350 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | Allante | E-350 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4565 cc | 5400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 290 HP | 255 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 4-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1708 kg | 2830 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 5504 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 2017 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 2111 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3505 mm |
