1992 Cadillac Allante vs. 2013 Cadillac ATS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ATS is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Cadillac Allante. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Cadillac Allante would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 1992 Cadillac Allante is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Cadillac Allante (290 HP) has 22 more horse power than 2013 Cadillac ATS. (268 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Cadillac Allante should accelerate faster than 2013 Cadillac ATS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Cadillac Allante weights approximately 178 kg more than 2013 Cadillac ATS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Cadillac ATS is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Cadillac Allante. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ATS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Cadillac Allante | 2013 Cadillac ATS | |
Make | Cadillac | Cadillac |
Model | Allante | ATS |
Year Released | 1992 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4565 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 290 HP | 268 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 86 mm |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1708 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4643 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1417 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2772 mm |