1992 Cadillac Allante vs. 2013 Chrysler 200 CONVERTIBLE
To start off, 2013 Chrysler 200 CONVERTIBLE is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Cadillac Allante. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Cadillac Allante would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 1992 Cadillac Allante is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Cadillac Allante (290 HP) has 11 more horse power than 2013 Chrysler 200 CONVERTIBLE. (279 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Cadillac Allante should accelerate faster than 2013 Chrysler 200 CONVERTIBLE. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chrysler 200 CONVERTIBLE weights approximately 106 kg more than 1992 Cadillac Allante.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Cadillac Allante | 2013 Chrysler 200 CONVERTIBLE | |
| Make | Cadillac | Chrysler |
| Model | Allante | 200 CONVERTIBLE |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4565 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 290 HP | 279 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 96 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 83 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1708 kg | 1814 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4947 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 2089 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2765 mm |
