1992 Cadillac Allante vs. 2013 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2013 Toyota Tundra is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Cadillac Allante. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Cadillac Allante would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Tundra (376 HP) has 86 more horse power than 1992 Cadillac Allante. (290 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1992 Cadillac Allante. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 642 kg more than 1992 Cadillac Allante. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Cadillac Allante. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Cadillac Allante | 2013 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | Allante | Tundra |
Year Released | 1992 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4565 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 290 HP | 376 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 102 mm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1708 kg | 2350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 5810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1935 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3700 mm |