1992 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1962 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 1992 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 5,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1992 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Cadillac Brougham (185 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 1962 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 1962 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1440 kg more than 1962 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1992 Cadillac Brougham (407 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 375 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 1992 Cadillac Brougham will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Cadillac Brougham | 1962 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Cadillac | Suzuki |
| Model | Brougham | Fronte |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1962 |
| Engine Size | 5733 cc | 360 cc |
| Horse Power | 185 HP | 18 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 407 Nm | 32 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3700 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1940 kg | 500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5620 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2060 mm |
