1992 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2000 Oldsmobile Profile
To start off, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1992 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile (206 HP) has 21 more horse power than 1992 Cadillac Brougham. (185 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile should accelerate faster than 1992 Cadillac Brougham. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 380 kg more than 2000 Oldsmobile Profile.
Because 2000 Oldsmobile Profile is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Cadillac Brougham. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Cadillac Brougham (407 Nm) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Oldsmobile Profile. (353 Nm). This means 1992 Cadillac Brougham will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Oldsmobile Profile.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Cadillac Brougham | 2000 Oldsmobile Profile | |
| Make | Cadillac | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Brougham | Profile |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5733 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 185 HP | 206 HP |
| Torque | 407 Nm | 353 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1940 kg | 1560 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5620 mm | 4710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2880 mm |
