1992 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2006 Ford F-250
To start off, 2006 Ford F-250 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1992 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Cadillac Brougham (185 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2006 Ford F-250. (177 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford F-250.
Because 2006 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Cadillac Brougham. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford F-250 (500 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Cadillac Brougham. (407 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2006 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Cadillac Brougham.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Cadillac Brougham | 2006 Ford F-250 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | Brougham | F-250 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5733 cc | 4198 cc |
| Horse Power | 185 HP | 177 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 407 Nm | 500 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 17.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5620 mm | 6250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 2060 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 2040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 3970 mm |
