1992 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2010 Renault Fluence
To start off, 2010 Renault Fluence is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1992 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Cadillac Brougham (185 HP) has 75 more horse power than 2010 Renault Fluence. (110 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Fluence. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 715 kg more than 2010 Renault Fluence. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1992 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Fluence, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Cadillac Brougham | 2010 Renault Fluence | |
Make | Cadillac | Renault |
Model | Brougham | Fluence |
Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5733 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 110 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1940 kg | 1225 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5620 mm | 4618 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1809 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1478 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2702 mm |