1992 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2012 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2012 Jaguar XF is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1992 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jaguar XF (187 HP) has 2 more horse power than 1992 Cadillac Brougham. (185 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1992 Cadillac Brougham.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jaguar XF (450 Nm) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Cadillac Brougham. (407 Nm). This means 2012 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Cadillac Brougham.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Cadillac Brougham | 2012 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
Model | Brougham | XF |
Year Released | 1992 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5733 cc | 2200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 187 HP |
Torque | 407 Nm | 450 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5620 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2908 mm |