1992 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2009 Cadillac BLS
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 4,894 cc (8 cylinders), 1992 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (247 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1992 Cadillac DeVille. (197 HP @ 4100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1992 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 50 kg more than 2009 Cadillac BLS.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Cadillac DeVille (373 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Cadillac BLS. (350 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1992 Cadillac DeVille will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Cadillac BLS.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Cadillac DeVille | 2009 Cadillac BLS | |
Make | Cadillac | Cadillac |
Model | DeVille | BLS |
Year Released | 1992 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4894 cc | 2792 cc |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 247 HP |
Engine RPM | 4100 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 350 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2820 mm | 2680 mm |