1992 Cadillac Seville vs. 1978 Volvo 66
To start off, 1992 Cadillac Seville is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 4,915 cc (8 cylinders), 1992 Cadillac Seville is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Cadillac Seville (197 HP @ 4100 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 1978 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Cadillac Seville should accelerate faster than 1978 Volvo 66.
Because 1978 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Cadillac Seville, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Cadillac Seville (372 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 278 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1992 Cadillac Seville will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Cadillac Seville | 1978 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | Seville | 66 |
Year Released | 1992 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4915 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 4100 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 372 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 8.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1550 mm |