1992 Caterham Super 7 vs. 2000 Ford ST 460
To start off, 2000 Ford ST 460 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Caterham Super 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Caterham Super 7 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford ST 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 209 more horse power than 1992 Caterham Super 7. (251 HP @ 7750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 1992 Caterham Super 7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Caterham Super 7 (250 Nm) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford ST 460. (178 Nm). This means 1992 Caterham Super 7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford ST 460.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Caterham Super 7 | 2000 Ford ST 460 | |
Make | Caterham | Ford |
Model | Super 7 | ST 460 |
Year Released | 1992 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 460 HP |
Engine RPM | 7750 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 250 Nm | 178 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2580 mm |