1992 Caterham Super 7 vs. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Caterham Super 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Caterham Super 7 would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1992 Caterham Super 7. (110 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1992 Caterham Super 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 754 kg more than 1992 Caterham Super 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Caterham Super 7. (130 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Caterham Super 7.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Caterham Super 7 | 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | Caterham | Chevrolet |
Model | Super 7 | Tracker |
Year Released | 1992 | 2004 |
Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1396 cc | 2491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 165 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 130 Nm | 221 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 75 mm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 546 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 61 L |