1992 Caterham Super 7 vs. 2006 Chevrolet Lumina
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Lumina is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Caterham Super 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Caterham Super 7 would be higher.
Because 1992 Caterham Super 7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Caterham Super 7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Lumina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Caterham Super 7 | 2006 Chevrolet Lumina | |
Make | Caterham | Chevrolet |
Model | Super 7 | Lumina |
Year Released | 1992 | 2006 |
Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |