1992 Chevrolet APV vs. 2003 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2003 Honda CR-V is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chevrolet APV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chevrolet APV would be higher. At 3,135 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Chevrolet APV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Honda CR-V (160 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1992 Chevrolet APV. (118 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1992 Chevrolet APV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Chevrolet APV weights approximately 72 kg more than 2003 Honda CR-V.
Because 2003 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Chevrolet APV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Chevrolet APV (237 Nm) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Honda CR-V. (220 Nm). This means 1992 Chevrolet APV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chevrolet APV | 2003 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Chevrolet | Honda |
Model | APV | CR-V |
Year Released | 1992 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3135 cc | 2360 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 220 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1518 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2630 mm |