1992 Chevrolet APV vs. 2003 Mazda 6
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chevrolet APV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chevrolet APV would be higher. At 3,135 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Chevrolet APV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Chevrolet APV (118 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Chevrolet APV should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Chevrolet APV weights approximately 245 kg more than 2003 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 6 (240 Nm) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Chevrolet APV. (237 Nm). This means 2003 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Chevrolet APV.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Chevrolet APV | 2003 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | APV | 6 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3135 cc | 1594 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 237 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1345 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2610 mm |
