1992 Chevrolet APV vs. 2003 Volvo C70
To start off, 2003 Volvo C70 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chevrolet APV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chevrolet APV would be higher. At 3,135 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Chevrolet APV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Volvo C70 (206 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1992 Chevrolet APV. (118 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 1992 Chevrolet APV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Chevrolet APV weights approximately 25 kg more than 2003 Volvo C70.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Volvo C70 (285 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Chevrolet APV. (237 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2003 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Chevrolet APV.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Chevrolet APV | 2003 Volvo C70 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
| Model | APV | C70 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3135 cc | 2401 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 206 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 237 Nm | 285 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1565 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2650 mm |
