1992 Chevrolet APV vs. 2012 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2012 Toyota Matrix is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chevrolet APV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chevrolet APV would be higher. At 3,135 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Chevrolet APV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Toyota Matrix (132 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1992 Chevrolet APV. (118 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1992 Chevrolet APV.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Chevrolet APV (237 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Toyota Matrix. (173 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1992 Chevrolet APV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Chevrolet APV | 2012 Toyota Matrix | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
| Model | APV | Matrix |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3135 cc | 1800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 132 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 237 Nm | 173 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4366 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1765 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1549 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2601 mm |
