1992 Chevrolet Astro vs. 1996 Holden XU 6
To start off, 1996 Holden XU 6 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chevrolet Astro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chevrolet Astro would be higher.
Because 1992 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Holden XU 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden XU 6 (515 Nm) has 177 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Chevrolet Astro. (338 Nm). This means 1996 Holden XU 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Chevrolet Astro. 1996 Holden XU 6 has automatic transmission and 1992 Chevrolet Astro has manual transmission. 1992 Chevrolet Astro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Holden XU 6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chevrolet Astro | 1996 Holden XU 6 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | Astro | XU 6 |
Year Released | 1992 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 183 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 338 Nm | 515 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |