1992 Chevrolet Astro vs. 2010 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2010 Holden Cruze is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chevrolet Astro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chevrolet Astro would be higher. At 4,291 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Chevrolet Astro (183 HP) has 45 more horse power than 2010 Holden Cruze. (138 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Chevrolet Astro should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Cruze.
Because 1992 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Holden Cruze. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Chevrolet Astro (338 Nm) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Cruze. (148 Nm). This means 1992 Chevrolet Astro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Chevrolet Astro | 2010 Holden Cruze | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
| Model | Astro | Cruze |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4291 cc | 1364 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 183 HP | 138 HP |
| Torque | 338 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4597 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1477 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2685 mm |
