1992 Chevrolet Beretta vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chevrolet Beretta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chevrolet Beretta would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Chevrolet Beretta (180 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2010 Ford E-350. (177 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Chevrolet Beretta should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford E-350.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Chevrolet Beretta (217 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-350. (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1992 Chevrolet Beretta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-350.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Chevrolet Beretta | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Beretta | E-350 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2259 cc | 5400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 177 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 217 Nm | 184 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4437 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1806 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2619 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 57 L |
