1992 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-350 (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1992 Chevrolet Blazer. (159 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1992 Chevrolet Blazer.
Because 1992 Chevrolet Blazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Ford E-350. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Chevrolet Blazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Chevrolet Blazer (312 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-350. (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1992 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-350.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chevrolet Blazer | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Blazer | E-350 |
Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4300 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 159 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 312 Nm | 184 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2619 mm |