1992 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1992 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 5,798 cc (8 cylinders), 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Chevrolet Camaro (138 HP) has 13 more horse power than 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (125 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 120 kg more than 1992 Chevrolet Camaro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass (305 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Chevrolet Camaro. (244 Nm). This means 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chevrolet Camaro | 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Chevrolet | Oldsmobile |
Model | Camaro | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1992 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3135 cc | 5798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 125 HP |
Torque | 244 Nm | 305 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1520 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2760 mm |