1992 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2000 Jaguar XKA
To start off, 2000 Jaguar XKA is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,399 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar XKA is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar XKA (466 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 328 more horse power than 1992 Chevrolet Camaro. (138 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar XKA should accelerate faster than 1992 Chevrolet Camaro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jaguar XKA weights approximately 400 kg more than 1992 Chevrolet Camaro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Jaguar XKA (843 Nm) has 599 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Chevrolet Camaro. (244 Nm). This means 2000 Jaguar XKA will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chevrolet Camaro | 2000 Jaguar XKA | |
Make | Chevrolet | Jaguar |
Model | Camaro | XKA |
Year Released | 1992 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3135 cc | 4399 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 466 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 244 Nm | 843 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1800 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2590 mm |