1992 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2001 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2001 Ford Ranger is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 3,135 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Ranger weights approximately 390 kg more than 1992 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 2001 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chevrolet Camaro | 2001 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Camaro | Ranger |
Year Released | 1992 | 2001 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3135 cc | 2970 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1790 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 3010 mm |