1992 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2004 Hyundai Tiburon
To start off, 2004 Hyundai Tiburon is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 3,135 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Hyundai Tiburon (139 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1992 Chevrolet Camaro. (138 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Hyundai Tiburon should accelerate faster than 1992 Chevrolet Camaro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 66 kg more than 2004 Hyundai Tiburon.
Because 1992 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Hyundai Tiburon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Chevrolet Camaro (244 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Hyundai Tiburon. (184 Nm). This means 1992 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Hyundai Tiburon.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chevrolet Camaro | 2004 Hyundai Tiburon | |
Make | Chevrolet | Hyundai |
Model | Camaro | Tiburon |
Year Released | 1992 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3135 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 244 Nm | 184 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 82.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 10.1:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1334 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 55 L |