1992 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2004 Pagani Zonda
To start off, 2004 Pagani Zonda is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 7,010 cc (12 cylinders), 2004 Pagani Zonda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Pagani Zonda (542 HP) has 404 more horse power than 1992 Chevrolet Camaro. (138 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Pagani Zonda should accelerate faster than 1992 Chevrolet Camaro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 150 kg more than 2004 Pagani Zonda.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chevrolet Camaro | 2004 Pagani Zonda | |
Make | Chevrolet | Pagani |
Model | Camaro | Zonda |
Year Released | 1992 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3135 cc | 7010 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 542 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4395 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2055 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1151 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2730 mm |