1992 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2005 Mazda B3000
To start off, 2005 Mazda B3000 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 3,135 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda B3000 (154 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1992 Chevrolet Camaro. (138 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda B3000 should accelerate faster than 1992 Chevrolet Camaro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda B3000 weights approximately 271 kg more than 1992 Chevrolet Camaro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1992 Chevrolet Camaro (244 Nm) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda B3000. (240 Nm). This means 1992 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda B3000.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chevrolet Camaro | 2005 Mazda B3000 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Camaro | B3000 |
Year Released | 1992 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3135 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 244 Nm | 240 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.1:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1671 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 74 L |