1992 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2008 Mazda CX-9

To start off, 2008 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 1992 Chevrolet Camaro. (138 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1992 Chevrolet Camaro.

Because 1992 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Chevrolet Camaro. (244 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Chevrolet Camaro.

Compare all specifications:

1992 Chevrolet Camaro 2008 Mazda CX-9
Make Chevrolet Mazda
Model Camaro CX-9
Year Released 1992 2008
Body Type Coupe SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3135 cc 3496 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 138 HP 273 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 6250 RPM
Torque 244 Nm 366 Nm
Torque RPM 3600 RPM 4500 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.3:1 10.3:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 7 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4880 mm 5080 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1940 mm
Vehicle Height 1290 mm 1730 mm
Wheelbase Size 2570 mm 2880 mm