1992 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2011 Mitsubishi i-MiEV
To start off, 2011 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 320 kg more than 2011 Mitsubishi i-MiEV.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Chevrolet Camaro | 2011 Mitsubishi i-MiEV | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Camaro | i-MiEV |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1080 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3395 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1475 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1600 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2550 mm |
