1992 Chevrolet Corsica vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1992 Chevrolet Corsica is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,189 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Chevrolet Corsica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Chevrolet Corsica (108 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Chevrolet Corsica should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Chevrolet Corsica weights approximately 25 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1992 Chevrolet Corsica (176 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1992 Chevrolet Corsica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Chevrolet Corsica | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Triumph |
| Model | Corsica | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2189 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 176 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 74.8 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 64 L |
