1992 Chevrolet Corsica vs. 1969 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 1992 Chevrolet Corsica is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 3,134 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Chevrolet Corsica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Chevrolet Corsica (140 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1969 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Chevrolet Corsica should accelerate faster than 1969 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Chevrolet Corsica weights approximately 354 kg more than 1969 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Zastava 850 K is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Zastava 850 K. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Chevrolet Corsica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chevrolet Corsica | 1969 Zastava 850 K | |
Make | Chevrolet | Zastava |
Model | Corsica | 850 K |
Year Released | 1992 | 1969 |
Engine Size | 3134 cc | 846 cc |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1209 kg | 855 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2010 mm |