1992 Chevrolet Corsica vs. 2010 Mazda 3
To start off, 2010 Mazda 3 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chevrolet Corsica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chevrolet Corsica would be higher. At 2,189 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Chevrolet Corsica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Chevrolet Corsica (108 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2010 Mazda 3. (104 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Chevrolet Corsica should accelerate faster than 2010 Mazda 3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Chevrolet Corsica (176 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mazda 3. (145 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1992 Chevrolet Corsica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chevrolet Corsica | 2010 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Corsica | 3 |
Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2189 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 55 L |