1992 Chevrolet Corvette vs. 2013 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XF is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chevrolet Corvette. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chevrolet Corvette would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XF weights approximately 320 kg more than 1992 Chevrolet Corvette.
Because 2013 Jaguar XF is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Chevrolet Corvette. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XF will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Chevrolet Corvette (949 Nm) has 324 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Jaguar XF. (625 Nm). This means 1992 Chevrolet Corvette will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Jaguar XF.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Chevrolet Corvette | 2013 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Jaguar |
| Model | Corvette | XF |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 503 HP |
| Torque | 949 Nm | 625 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.7:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Top Speed | 351 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1555 kg | 1875 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 2053 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1190 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2909 mm |
