1992 Chevrolet Lumina vs. 1975 Mazda 929

To start off, 1992 Chevrolet Lumina is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 3,350 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Chevrolet Lumina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Chevrolet Lumina (210 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1975 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Chevrolet Lumina should accelerate faster than 1975 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Chevrolet Lumina weights approximately 381 kg more than 1975 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1975 Mazda 929 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Mazda 929. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Chevrolet Lumina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Chevrolet Lumina (292 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Mazda 929. (137 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1992 Chevrolet Lumina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Mazda 929.

Compare all specifications:

1992 Chevrolet Lumina 1975 Mazda 929
Make Chevrolet Mazda
Model Lumina 929
Year Released 1992 1975
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3350 cc 1769 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 210 HP 83 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 292 Nm 137 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 3000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 92 mm 80.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84 mm 88 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.3:1 8.6:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1541 kg 1160 kg
Vehicle Length 5040 mm 4550 mm
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 1670 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2740 mm 2520 mm