1992 Chevrolet Lumina vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 1992 Chevrolet Lumina is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 3,350 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Chevrolet Lumina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Chevrolet Lumina (210 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 143 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Chevrolet Lumina should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Chevrolet Lumina weights approximately 767 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chevrolet Lumina | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Zastava |
Model | Lumina | 102 |
Year Released | 1992 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 3350 cc | 1302 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1541 kg | 774 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2160 mm |