1992 Chevrolet Lumina vs. 2008 Rover 75
To start off, 2008 Rover 75 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chevrolet Lumina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chevrolet Lumina would be higher. At 3,350 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Chevrolet Lumina is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Chevrolet Lumina weights approximately 6 kg more than 2008 Rover 75.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Chevrolet Lumina (292 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Rover 75. (240 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1992 Chevrolet Lumina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chevrolet Lumina | 2008 Rover 75 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Rover |
Model | Lumina | 75 |
Year Released | 1992 | 2008 |
Engine Size | 3350 cc | 2497 cc |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 292 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 82.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 10.5:1 |
Top Speed | 209 km/hour | 220 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1541 kg | 1535 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2750 mm |