1992 Chevrolet Suburban vs. 1967 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1992 Chevrolet Suburban is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 5,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1992 Chevrolet Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Chevrolet Suburban (187 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Chevrolet Suburban should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Chevrolet Suburban weights approximately 1205 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1992 Chevrolet Suburban (408 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 275 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1992 Chevrolet Suburban will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chevrolet Suburban | 1967 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Suburban | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1992 | 1967 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5733 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 408 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 9 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2145 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5580 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3350 mm | 2210 mm |