1992 Chevrolet Suburban vs. 2010 Audi TT
To start off, 2010 Audi TT is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chevrolet Suburban. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chevrolet Suburban would be higher. At 5,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1992 Chevrolet Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Chevrolet Suburban (187 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2010 Audi TT. (168 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Chevrolet Suburban should accelerate faster than 2010 Audi TT.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Chevrolet Suburban (408 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Audi TT. (350 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 1992 Chevrolet Suburban will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chevrolet Suburban | 2010 Audi TT | |
Make | Chevrolet | Audi |
Model | Suburban | TT |
Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5733 cc | 1964 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 408 Nm | 350 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automated manual |
Number of Seats | 9 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5580 mm | 4201 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1359 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3350 mm | 2469 mm |