1992 Chevrolet Suburban vs. 2011 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2011 Ford Ecosport is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chevrolet Suburban. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chevrolet Suburban would be higher. At 7,438 cc (8 cylinders), 1992 Chevrolet Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Chevrolet Suburban (227 HP) has 84 more horse power than 2011 Ford Ecosport. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Chevrolet Suburban should accelerate faster than 2011 Ford Ecosport.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Ford Ecosport has automatic transmission and 1992 Chevrolet Suburban has manual transmission. 1992 Chevrolet Suburban will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Ford Ecosport will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chevrolet Suburban | 2011 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Suburban | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1992 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7438 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 227 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 9 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5580 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3350 mm | 2490 mm |