1992 Chrysler ES vs. 1955 Isuzu Minx
To start off, 1992 Chrysler ES is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Chrysler ES (94 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1955 Isuzu Minx. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Chrysler ES should accelerate faster than 1955 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Chrysler ES weights approximately 185 kg more than 1955 Isuzu Minx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1955 Isuzu Minx is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Isuzu Minx. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Chrysler ES, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chrysler ES | 1955 Isuzu Minx | |
Make | Chrysler | Isuzu |
Model | ES | Minx |
Year Released | 1992 | 1955 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1265 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2370 mm |