1992 Chrysler ES vs. 1979 Mazda 626
To start off, 1992 Chrysler ES is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Chrysler ES weights approximately 180 kg more than 1979 Mazda 626.
Because 1979 Mazda 626 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Mazda 626. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Chrysler ES, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chrysler ES | 1979 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | ES | 626 |
Year Released | 1992 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2972 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 1045 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2520 mm |