1992 Chrysler ES vs. 1980 Volvo 164
To start off, 1992 Chrysler ES is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 164 would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Chrysler ES (139 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 164. (138 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Chrysler ES should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 164.
Because 1980 Volvo 164 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 164. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Chrysler ES, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Chrysler ES (232 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Volvo 164. (204 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1992 Chrysler ES will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Volvo 164.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chrysler ES | 1980 Volvo 164 | |
Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
Model | ES | 164 |
Year Released | 1992 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2972 cc | 2664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 232 Nm | 204 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 5610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3350 mm |