1992 Chrysler ES vs. 1996 Mazda Midge
To start off, 1996 Mazda Midge is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Chrysler ES (94 HP) has 27 more horse power than 1996 Mazda Midge. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Chrysler ES should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda Midge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Chrysler ES weights approximately 173 kg more than 1996 Mazda Midge. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Chrysler ES (166 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda Midge. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1992 Chrysler ES will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda Midge.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chrysler ES | 1996 Mazda Midge | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | ES | Midge |
Year Released | 1992 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1323 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 166 Nm | 101 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 972 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1400 mm |