1992 Chrysler ES vs. 1996 Rover 200
To start off, 1996 Rover 200 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Rover 200 (108 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1992 Chrysler ES. (94 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 1992 Chrysler ES. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Chrysler ES weights approximately 80 kg more than 1996 Rover 200.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Chrysler ES (166 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Rover 200. (137 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 1992 Chrysler ES will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chrysler ES | 1996 Rover 200 | |
Make | Chrysler | Rover |
Model | ES | 200 |
Year Released | 1992 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1589 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 166 Nm | 137 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 1065 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2510 mm |