1992 Chrysler ES vs. 1998 Ford Contour
To start off, 1998 Ford Contour is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Ford Contour (195 HP @ 6625 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1992 Chrysler ES. (139 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Ford Contour should accelerate faster than 1992 Chrysler ES. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Ford Contour weights approximately 186 kg more than 1992 Chrysler ES. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Chrysler ES (232 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Ford Contour. (224 Nm @ 5625 RPM). This means 1992 Chrysler ES will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Ford Contour.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chrysler ES | 1998 Ford Contour | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | ES | Contour |
Year Released | 1992 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2972 cc | 2544 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 195 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6625 RPM |
Torque | 232 Nm | 224 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 5625 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 1411 kg |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2730 mm |