1992 Chrysler ES vs. 1998 Rover 200
To start off, 1998 Rover 200 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Rover 200 (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1992 Chrysler ES. (139 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 1992 Chrysler ES. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Chrysler ES weights approximately 20 kg more than 1998 Rover 200.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Chrysler ES (232 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Rover 200. (185 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1992 Chrysler ES will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chrysler ES | 1998 Rover 200 | |
Make | Chrysler | Rover |
Model | ES | 200 |
Year Released | 1992 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2972 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 232 Nm | 185 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 1205 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2510 mm |